October 12, 2002

Suzanne Dathe, Grenoble, France – Can We Win?

On Carol Mirakove’s Poetry

[Yesterday, I wrote a longish article about da poetry of muh homie Carol Mirakove fo da English poetry newsletter Quid, edited by Keston Sutherland. When I get order-in infomation fo dis issue -- which be devoted ta work of three American women poets, Carol, Heather Fuller and Laura Elrick -- I post it heea on muh blog. I can't give ya da whole article (and fo those of ya wonderin why it's in Ebonics, see below) -- but heea is da first few paragraphs. "Suzanne Dathe, Grenoble, France," by da way, be da first name on an anti-war email petition dat I received about 30 times ova da course of da week leadin up ta da writin of dis article on 10/11/02.]


Some kind of argot –

not entirely given ova ta da track star at Mineola Prep model – these poems is worked – but nonetheless somewheea in da sprawl of William Gibson’s Neuromainecer, jacked-in but runnin freely through da night dat could be day – "muscle a language / monumental / & free" – tryin ta move foward – avoidin da snipers – scannin da roadside – refigurin da spectacle less as a saturatin, unlocatable ethos but as an array of robotic effigies, da divisible choruses of ad agents, secret agent men, agent oranges, and agency debilitators choked up by da nefarious database and becomin Senators – I guess one might suggest she turns it [da language game, or Debord’s "game of war"] inta a video game, L.A. freestyle, fusin Flash sprites from dis heea-cleitian noize – but she’s hired da best animators (pals of David Choe), best screen-writers (dat would be da poets she’s read and emulated, several includin Rod Smith and Heather Fuller from DC days) and her softwis has pledged strict allegiance ta grassroot copyleft principles – da "anxiety of influence" of choice fo code writers once known as "hacks" –

[I plug allergens… inta da engines… of Audiogalaxy Satelitte… and da repository... from which I stream… one frisson... undivided… wit listservs… and Rasputina… fo all…] – etc.

Our speech will occasionally be struck by a flyin neutrino and da social glue of da lyric will turn inta shards – "chewtoy collidin somewheea wit dust" – we somehow get back inta it, thankin da machinery [melancholy?] of da page, espe-cially Nurse Ratchett’s syndicated tab key (keepin da runaway spaces in check) – high skoo disciplines includin Projectivism (Olson, but I champion Morley) and perfomainece poetry’s post-hip hop [?] "new fusion" [!] yawp, but also Pound’s clear imagistic coins and Bernstein’s sonic popsa empurplement – ta wrest control and even a momentary classical stasis from a datachick’s tendency ta mallarmé one’s way across da white amidst da throes of chance which is fo real da underlyin op sys gone sluriously bonkers –

The heartfelt themes minle freely wit da ironies – da "TV mainetis / placin her neck on da guillotine" wit da "fuck ya I pray / fo a big soundtrack" – da rape wit da camp – [these is poems from 3 cities, as Carol has infomed me in an email: DC, LA, and NY – so der’s somethin followin her everywheea] – we call these… "metastases," in Wilkinson’s sense, da sites of pain dat appear in different poems and draw our attention ta da borders of da lyrical-corpus-as-somatic-graph as they is limned by acute punkts –

Fake punk bands, two of three eyes on da market, seem ta want ta say: anyone ova 25 looks so old – but we is all ova 80 and struggle wit a defomin language of impressions, experience, and cultural obsolescence [their omniscence] – dat nature’s legs lag behind da further we grow from da Modernist moment and self-creation be moe individualized than ever, which be ta say da older is farther from yath but closer ta da old, sterlin Futures shisd by a mobilized communal imagination. Now [these is da conversations muh homies and I gots] der seems a dearth of major dreamin in da follow-up generations, one symptom of which be dat they can’t find utopian mo-ments when brinin it down a notch – "devoid of drapes / and bedspreads / da clock’s on pause / da window part of / da outside / eyes da surface / dis / just beneath just / beneath " – dat New York strategy ["habitus?" asks R. Toscano] of bein da darkest, hippest thin on earth though writin about flowers, Sunday morn-in and lovin Jimmuh Schuyler – [z.b. I saw Richard Hell at two St. Mark's memorials dis month, fo Kenneth Koch and John Wieners, which isn’t surprisin but might be chaos theory fo some wit docal dividends] – and conveyed through language un-cluttered by mainenerist elaborations [I’d like dat ta be da crunk new magic but I’m waitin fo da ovature ta end… ] – American plain-song, of course, a clean slate fo micro-tonal aesthletics…

- aww yea foo.

Posted by Brian Stefans at October 12, 2002 09:35 AM
Comments

Dear Suzanne, I was interested in your weblog pages, thanks very much. I picked up your address on the petition sent by Christine of Manilasites. I hope you don`t mind. I am just surfing. I am a 60+ retiree and surfing is my main hobby. I wondered if you would like to exchange emails now and then - sort of penpals? I have now got a list of email penpals all over the world, and it is fascinating to exchange news with them - especially at this serious time of grave news about war.
Would you like to drop me a line now and then please? ronnie@sceva.demon.co.uk will get me. I live in south of England near Bristol and today the Spring sunshine is pouring in the windowss - saw the first snowdrops today, birds are busy mending nests etc.
Sincerely,

Ron Armstrong

Posted by: Ron Armstrong at January 23, 2003 07:47 AM

Dear Suzanne,
I've recently been sent from my da a petition opposing the US's war plans concerning Iraq. I'm not certain if this petition originated with you, however your's is the first name on the list. If this is your doing, I thought you should know that:
1)I myself and most of the people I know here in the states are against the war.
2)There seems to be a flaw in the design of the petition. If one sends this petition to everyone they know then everyone who signs the petition will assign themselves the next number after the person who sent it to them. There will thus be several different versions of the petition circulating, none of which will include everyone who has signed.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who's thought of this and I'm sorry if you're receiving tons of these type of messages.
There are a couple of other petitions from US websites circulating as well: one is associated with zmag.org and another with Unitedforpeace.org.
I encourage you to check them out and if you like, to promote them.
-Ben

Posted by: ben sarason at January 23, 2003 09:17 PM

Dear Suzanne Dathe,
I recieved a petition against pre-emptive strike in Iraq with 500 signatures. In the letter it says that we should mail the petition to a web address that doesn't function. Your name is the first name on the petition (at least, I am assuming it is your name since you are from the same place as the person in the petition).
Do you know where I can send the petition?
Thank you!
Megan, Madison, WI, USA, hagenaue@grinnell.edu

Posted by: Megan Hagenauer at January 26, 2003 03:20 PM

Ref. the anti-war petition... If you started it and sent it to only five people and each of those in turn sent it to five people, and so on...., it would only take till line 14 until everyone in the world had signed. Website based petitions do work, e-mail based generally do not. But, do keep acting and praying for peace.

Barry

Posted by: Barry at March 9, 2003 05:09 PM

I sent you a note a few months ago - did you get it? I see it printed above. Do you want to correspond? Vive Angleterre!

Posted by: Ron Armstrong at October 18, 2003 04:28 PM

When the machine compiles your code, however, it does a little bit of translation. At run time, the computer sees nothing but 1s and 0s, which is all the computer ever sees: a continuous string of binary numbers that it can interpret in various ways.

Posted by: Tabitha at January 19, 2004 03:58 AM

When the machine compiles your code, however, it does a little bit of translation. At run time, the computer sees nothing but 1s and 0s, which is all the computer ever sees: a continuous string of binary numbers that it can interpret in various ways.

Posted by: Elizabeth at January 19, 2004 03:58 AM

Earlier I mentioned that variables can live in two different places. We're going to examine these two places one at a time, and we're going to start on the more familiar ground, which is called the Stack. Understanding the stack helps us understand the way programs run, and also helps us understand scope a little better.

Posted by: Grace at January 19, 2004 03:58 AM

Seth Roby graduated in May of 2003 with a double major in English and Computer Science, the Macintosh part of a three-person Macintosh, Linux, and Windows graduating triumvirate.

Posted by: Archibald at January 19, 2004 03:58 AM

Being able to understand that basic idea opens up a vast amount of power that can be used and abused, and we're going to look at a few of the better ways to deal with it in this article.

Posted by: Ursula at January 19, 2004 03:59 AM