December 31, 2002

Suzanne Dathe, Grenoble, France – Can We Win? (On Carol Mirakove's Poetry)

[Here's a short essay I wrote for Keston Sutherland's poetry zine Quid. I still don't have ordering information for this issue but if you are interested in acquiring one please write to me. "Suzanne Dathe, Grenoble, France" is the first name on an anti-war email petition that I received about 30 times over the course of the week leading up to the writing of this article on 10/11/02.]


Suzanne Dathe, Grenoble, France – Can We Win?
(On Carol Mirakove's Poetry)


Some kind of argot –

not entirely given over to the track star at Mineola Prep model – these poems are worked – but nonetheless somewhere in the sprawl of William Gibson’s Neuromancer, jacked-in but running freely through the night that could be day – "muscle a language / monumental / & free" – trying to move forward – avoiding the snipers – scanning the roadside – refiguring the spectacle less as a saturating, unlocatable ethos but as an array of robotic effigies, the divisible choruses of ad agents, secret agent men, agent oranges, and agency debilitators choked up by the nefarious database and becoming Senators – I guess one might suggest she turns it [the language game, or Debord’s "game of war"] into a video game, L.A. freestyle, fusing Flash sprites from this herecleitian noize – but she’s hired the best animators (pals of David Choe), best screenwriters (that would be the poets she’s read and emulated, several including Rod Smith and Heather Fuller from DC days) and her software has pledged strict allegiance to grassroot copyleft principles – the "anxiety of influence" of choice for code writers once known as "hacks" –

[I plug allergens… into the engines… of Audiogalaxy Satelitte… and the repository... from which I stream… one frisson... undivided… with listservs… and Rasputina… for all…] – etc.

Our speech will occasionally be struck by a flying neutrino and the social glue of the lyric will turn into shards – "chewtoy colliding somewhere with dust" – we somehow get back into it, thanking the machinery [melancholy?] of the page, especially Nurse Ratchett’s syndicated tab key (keeping the runaway spaces in check) – high school disciplines including Projectivism (Olson, but I champion Morley) and performance poetry’s post-hip hop [?] "new fusion" [!] yawp, but also Pound’s clear imagistic coins and Bernstein’s sonic dada empurplement – to wrest control and even a momentary classical stasis from a datachick’s tendency to mallarmé one’s way across the white amidst the throes of chance which are really the underlying op sys gone sluriously bonkers –

The heartfelt themes mingle freely with the ironies – the "TV mantis / placing her neck on the guillotine" with the "fuck you I pray / for a big soundtrack" – the rape with the camp – [these are poems from 3 cities, as Carol has informed me in an email: DC, LA, and NY – so there’s something following her everywhere] – we call these… "metastases," in Wilkinson’s sense, the sites of pain that appear in different poems and draw our attention to the borders of the lyrical-corpus-as-somatic-graph as they are limned by acute punkts –

Fake punk bands, two of three eyes on the market, seem to want to say: anyone over 25 looks so old – but we are all over 80 and struggle with a deforming language of impressions, experience, and cultural obsolescence [their omniscence] – that nature’s legs lag behind the further we grow from the Modernist moment and self-creation is more individualized than ever, which is to say the older are farther from youth but closer to the old, sterling Futures shared by a mobilized communal imagination. Now [these are the conversations my friends and I have] there seems a dearth of major dreaming in the follow-up generations, one symptom of which is that they can’t find utopian moments when bringing it down a notch – "devoid of drapes / and bedspreads / the clock’s on pause / the window part of / the outside / eyes the surface / this / just beneath just / beneath " – that New York strategy ["habitus?" asks R. Toscano] of being the darkest, hippest thing on earth though writing about flowers, Sunday morning and loving Jimmy Schuyler – [z.b. I saw Richard Hell at two St. Mark's memorials this month, for Kenneth Koch and John Wieners, which isn’t surprising but might be chaos theory for some with doctoral dividends] – and conveyed through language uncluttered by mannerist elaborations [I’d like that to be the good new magic but I’m waiting for the overture to end… ] – American plain-song, of course, a clean slate for microtonal aesthletics…

[the other folks in my office aren’t talking to me because they see I am reading these poems –
I suppose I always am because they don’t talk to me even when I’m not holding 8.5 x 11 soon to be A4 sheets
– it’s too bad –
– I’d tell them of the mirakove worker and the minus signs that became an em-daschle in my Word autoformat mode…] –

Of course I’d like to mention William Carlos Williams, the poem as a single motion – in Mirakove’s case, perhaps a spill, or a butoh-like abandon in which the body is given over entirely to gravity (Min Tanaka, when asked about his jump: "I didn’t jump, I fell"), but with an electric animé splendor – so that at the finale of "extensity: to Mina Loy" there is that WCW trick of ending a poem with one little pocket of divergent activity ("this was / Icarus falling") quite often closing on a gerund or adverb: "tumbling / seductions / that would also be made / of glass & flower / vengefully." This "leaves them wanting more" but also continues the activity of the poem beyond it, deeper into the pit of the entropic flowerpot or contemplating the emotional and moral elements that have become LIVED because we have shared the wandering – like the camera drawing back at the end of a feature (for instance, Easy Rider, our Fonda-ness enflamed) – something still happening, it’s not strictly death, so why stop the camera now?

I write "an argot" above, meaning I guess those criminal or inner-city languages that surface like pearls in which neologisms and nicknames are pretty much the same thing – "sucktank / abducted weapon / at the stucco" – and reflect some sort of urban verbscape of "snipers," "vixens," – as I suggested earlier (drawing from the same poem "girl in dunes"), Mirakove is hardly a meditative poet in any conventional sense nor a language poet – there are constant and never indifferent negotiations between the will to self and the impositions of the world’s image banks – one can certainly not do without the other (and Carol, that's her name, has long been the snappiest, but also most giddily recombinatory, dresser on the NY scene) – Baudelaire loved artifice as did Oscar Wilde but New York vatics tend toward the newspaper realism of faded black jeans and poems of the catholic self, simply because Dada is everywhere and there is hardly need to dress up when everything’s on the verge of becoming a ready-made

(so you thought – not any longer – though the seventies will be back sooner than you’d like as this year’s budget crisis unfolds – piles of garbage and subway fare hikes, David Bowie kissed on the lips singing "I am a DJ," etc. etc. – probably not as interesting, but yet fodder of an urban apocalypsists imagination, more readymades – )

now that the dot com bust has also revealed to us how uninteresting our fashion sense has been [and how interesting the 20th century can be!] we’ll like that artifice spirit coming back, but with cybernetic tensegrity, grafted to the soft tissue between the bones, a "guttered ballerina," as nothing can be plain anymore – "the 'Nineties' tried your game / And died, there’s nothing in it" (Pound).

Words just sort of drop in in this non-linear lyric writing – no base tone, always ready to spring – Mirakove

it’s so possible to be indifferent, the first thing the fake punk bands do, elevating middle-class indirection to a cardboard socialite platform (an enervated Alex Katz), but there’s something to be said for a poem that won’t suffer indifference after having already rented it kühl loft space deep in its agitant's heart – "it doesn’t pay to not be complex, muting in an ear leaves chained an archived document to affront shellac, she is susceptible to faith" – and in another poem: "you were bored out of long whatevers," or "you distracted your distraction without careless closeness away from that beginning" – it’s hard to start where one is I suppose –

there is nothing natural about this "argot," I think she made it up.

Posted by Brian Stefans at December 31, 2002 12:21 PM
Comments

Don't be lonely. Sometimes people are just quiet.

Happy New Year.

Posted by: the Laurable Laura at December 31, 2002 01:39 PM

Me fale sobre o e-mail que recebi: "Os Estados Unidos estão a ponto de declarar a guerra. Hoje nos encontramos a um ponto de desequilíbrio mundial que poderá ocorrer uma Terceira Guerra mundial. Se você é contra, a ONU se encontra recebendo assinaturas para que evite este trágicop acontecimento mundial".

Posted by: Bujha at February 3, 2003 08:39 AM

That gives us a pretty good starting point to understand a lot more about variables, and that's what we'll be examining next lesson. Those new variable types I promised last lesson will finally make an appearance, and we'll examine a few concepts that we'll use to organize our data into more meaningful structures, a sort of precursor to the objects that Cocoa works with. And we'll delve a little bit more into the fun things we can do by looking at those ever-present bits in a few new ways.

Posted by: Margaret at January 18, 2004 03:00 PM

Each Stack Frame represents a function. The bottom frame is always the main function, and the frames above it are the other functions that main calls. At any given time, the stack can show you the path your code has taken to get to where it is. The top frame represents the function the code is currently executing, and the frame below it is the function that called the current function, and the frame below that represents the function that called the function that called the current function, and so on all the way down to main, which is the starting point of any C program.

Posted by: Winifred at January 18, 2004 03:01 PM

This will allow us to use a few functions we didn't have access to before. These lines are still a mystery for now, but we'll explain them soon. Now we'll start working within the main function, where favoriteNumber is declared and used. The first thing we need to do is change how we declare the variable. Instead of

Posted by: Samuel at January 18, 2004 03:03 PM

Being able to understand that basic idea opens up a vast amount of power that can be used and abused, and we're going to look at a few of the better ways to deal with it in this article.

Posted by: Elizeus at January 18, 2004 03:03 PM

But some variables are immortal. These variables are declared outside of blocks, outside of functions. Since they don't have a block to exist in they are called global variables (as opposed to local variables), because they exist in all blocks, everywhere, and they never go out of scope. Although powerful, these kinds of variables are generally frowned upon because they encourage bad program design.

Posted by: Michael at January 18, 2004 03:03 PM

Let's take a moment to reexamine that. What we've done here is create two variables. The first variable is in the Heap, and we're storing data in it. That's the obvious one. But the second variable is a pointer to the first one, and it exists on the Stack. This variable is the one that's really called favoriteNumber, and it's the one we're working with. It is important to remember that there are now two parts to our simple variable, one of which exists in each world. This kind of division is common is C, but omnipresent in Cocoa. When you start making objects, Cocoa makes them all in the Heap because the Stack isn't big enough to hold them. In Cocoa, you deal with objects through pointers everywhere and are actually forbidden from dealing with them directly.

Posted by: Roger at January 18, 2004 06:57 PM

Let's see an example by converting our favoriteNumber variable from a stack variable to a heap variable. The first thing we'll do is find the project we've been working on and open it up in Project Builder. In the file, we'll start right at the top and work our way down. Under the line:

Posted by: Bridget at January 18, 2004 06:58 PM

Note first that favoriteNumbers type changed. Instead of our familiar int, we're now using int*. The asterisk here is an operator, which is often called the "star operator". You will remember that we also use an asterisk as a sign for multiplication. The positioning of the asterisk changes its meaning. This operator effectively means "this is a pointer". Here it says that favoriteNumber will be not an int but a pointer to an int. And instead of simply going on to say what we're putting in that int, we have to take an extra step and create the space, which is what does. This function takes an argument that specifies how much space you need and then returns a pointer to that space. We've passed it the result of another function, , which we pass int, a type. In reality, is a macro, but for now we don't have to care: all we need to know is that it tells us the size of whatever we gave it, in this case an int. So when is done, it gives us an address in the heap where we can put an integer. It is important to remember that the data is stored in the heap, while the address of that data is stored in a pointer on the stack.

Posted by: Ferdinand at January 18, 2004 06:59 PM

These secret identities serve a variety of purposes, and they help us to understand how variables work. In this lesson, we'll be writing a little less code than we've done in previous articles, but we'll be taking a detailed look at how variables live and work.

Posted by: Evan at January 18, 2004 06:59 PM

That gives us a pretty good starting point to understand a lot more about variables, and that's what we'll be examining next lesson. Those new variable types I promised last lesson will finally make an appearance, and we'll examine a few concepts that we'll use to organize our data into more meaningful structures, a sort of precursor to the objects that Cocoa works with. And we'll delve a little bit more into the fun things we can do by looking at those ever-present bits in a few new ways.

Posted by: Harman at January 18, 2004 06:59 PM